
Being in love should never be interconnected with death; however, when it comes to LGBTQ+ teens, this is frighteningly the case. Whether you read Sedgwick’s “Queer and Now” or “How to Bring Your Kids up Gay”, you find that she stresses “that queer teenagers are two to three times likelier to attempt suicide, and to accomplish it, than others” (“Queer and Now”). Mentioning these chilling truths at the forefront of both texts, emphasizes for the reader that they need to be aware of who they are fighting for and the severity of the situation. But how? How do we go about bringing such change when educators (like a handful of this class are striving to be) can be fired for showing any recognition of understanding their queer students or being queer themselves?
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Federal Government) continues to update their laws, including those involving the employment of queer teachers. Their website has a page dedicated to these laws; however orientation and transgender identification is not present on their main page or links to discrimination in the workplace laws (https://www.eeoc.gov/discrimination-type). Despite having twelve categories to many other important topics, LGBTQ+ rights are missing which is something that I believe should be included on that list. At the state and local level, fair employment law activists have been pushing for more laws not only prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination, but also discrimination for teachers who identify as transgender. Some examples include NY State’s Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act (first added in 2002 as part of their Human Rights Law) and more recently in 2019, the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act which included transgender identities and others in the spectrum.
I would also like to bring up the article, “Dancing Queer Children”, specifically highlighting the heteronormative speculation JJ receives on a show that embraces the openly queer. Despite being queer himself, JJ is told by the mothers of the show that the girls and even other mothers will fall head over heels for him. Also, despite being clearly underage, the mothers push the envelope by even creating the sexual innuendo of girls coming back stage to get “some ice cream” and finish it off by aging him up and saying that he is “the man of the group”.
Ew.
When reading the section, I was reminded of the numerous times I myself along with others have had to deal with heteronormative claims, like the all-too-popular gender reveal parties and the comments under same-sex wedding pictures exclaiming “Double wedding! #FriendGoals”. It feels like the heterosexual population is trying to stick LGBTQ+ daily existence under a veil while still waving a token card stating that people should not worry because they have a gay friend. It’s strange to me that on a show like ‘Dancing Queen’, mothers would fall into this skewed normative behavior in order for what, I am sure, they thought was “funny” banter before a show. Even more disturbing are their repeated comments falling into pedophilic red-flag territory, all for the purpose of portraying the sole male child of the group as being the epitome of masculinity and “manly-man-ness”.
As Sedgewick has explained multiple times in both of her texts, there appears to be a heterosexual culture of purposefully masculinizing seemingly-effeminate boys by coercion of traits and understandings via a male mentor or speech like what was said on the show. According the analysts she mentions is “How to Bring Your Kids up Gay”, a homosexual can only be healthy if they are grown up and act masculine. That sounds extremely contradictory and damaging for LGBTQ+ youths or people who do not actively conform to gender norms. The “Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood” diagnosis the Sedgewick mentioned brought up some interesting things that I will include in a question about how boys who suggest femininity are treated much more harshly than girls who directly deny their femininity in what is classified as part of effeminophobia. I believe this may be a consequence of the notion of kinship and independence. Girls are encouraged to hug each other and go to sleepovers, while optionally taking on the role of being a “strong, independent women”, while boys only have the choice of being independent and claiming “no homo” when showing any sign of affection or companionship with other boys.
These texts brought many things to attention and are meant to leave the reader pondering. That being said, my questions for you all are:
- In Sedgewick’s “Queer and Now”, she mentions to her seminar of students (mostly comprising of heterosexual students) that she built the class for a primarily queer audience. As a result, the students were outraged by this due to their straight-entitlement. This happened back in the 1980s. This makes me think if the same view would be still observed in 2020. Have you seen such behavior happening in today’s queer-focused classes? Has there been a shift in the audience demographic?
- At the time of writing “How to Bring Your Kids up Gay”, Sedgewick wrote about how studies on homosexual relationships seemed to be “exclusively about boys”. Why may this be? Why is femininity not shoved down young girl’s throats (to the point where being a tom-boy is acceptable), but masculinity is?
- Thinking about “Dancing Queer Children”, what can we do to make elementary and middle schools inclusive for queer/questioning children?
Works Cited
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, “How to Bring Your Kids up Gay”. Social Text, Duke University Press, 1991.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, “Queer and Now.” Tendencies, Routledge, 1994.
Zaborskis, Mary. “Dancing Queer Children.” Public Books, 17 June 2020, www.publicbooks.org/dancing-queer-children/.



